Answer by Blackhawk-17
Size is not the determining factor in this. Even the 168 GB dB is a relatively inconsequential switch if it is not active. It is the level of synch and the active transactions that cause issues. Put...
View ArticleAnswer by Morgan Leppink
Excellent information BlackHawk-17, thanks for that. We had really hoped that we could make these failovers happen without any noticable loss of service at all, so resorting to single user mode for...
View ArticleAnswer by Morgan Leppink
The ultimate solution to this issue is here: http://ask.sqlservercentral.com/questions/50851/mirroringrecovery-problem-need-help-please.html
View ArticleAnswer by Blackhawk-17
Size is not the determining factor in this. Even the 168 GB dB is a relatively inconsequential switch if it is not active. It is the level of synch and the active transactions that cause issues. Put...
View ArticleAnswer by Morgan Leppink
Excellent information BlackHawk-17, thanks for that. We had really hoped that we could make these failovers happen without any noticable loss of service at all, so resorting to single user mode for...
View ArticleAnswer by Morgan Leppink
The ultimate solution to this issue is here: http://ask.sqlservercentral.com/questions/50851/mirroringrecovery-problem-need-help-please.html
View Article
